17.08.2019
 raaaa Study Paper

Weak Connections Theory

Explanations > Hypotheses > Weakened Ties Theory

Description | Research | Example | So What? | See also | References

Explanation

We have the two friends and acquaintances. Our friends are often part of a good group who also largely know one another. The acquaintances are far less likely to learn one another. Regarding connection with standard society and staying in touch with what is going on in the wider world, the weak jewelry with our colleagues are paradoxically much more crucial than the inwardly-focused conversations with our closer close friends. Indeed, the knowledge we consult with our friends frequently comes from wider sources. Inside the familiarity of strong jewelry we make use of simple restricted codes, in which much is acted and overlooked. In communicating through the fragile ties, we really need more explicit elaborated requirements for which means to be totally communicated. When elaborating, we certainly have more opportunity for creativeness and the thought that all it stimulates makes innovation more likely. A lot more weak ties we have, the greater connected to the world we are and are also more likely to obtain important information regarding ideas, dangers and chances in time as a solution to all of them. Societies and social systems that have more weak ties are more likely to become dynamic and innovative. In the event the system is mainly made up of strong ties, it will be fragmented and uncoordinated. Some poor ties are superior to others. Weakened ties to friends of your friends are certainly not as valuable as poor ties anywhere else as the knowledge and further contacts are likely to be a lot like those of your friends. Weak connections that become a member of separate social groups are bridges. There are also absent ties, where you may expect a tie but it really does not exist, for example in a group of close friends where a couple are still distant from one one more. As there are usually more persons in reduce classes, they may have greater selection of friends and greater potential for finding comparable 'people just like me' and so compensate by...

References: Granovetter (1973), Granovetter (1983), Milgram (1967)